Friday, July 21, 2006

Ratification!

P-I members met today in the first-floor conference room to discuss the proposed contract, and voted to approve it.

(41 members voted.)

Monday, July 17, 2006

Since you asked...

Some members looked at recently posted Times wage information and wanted to know who's getting paid more: Times or P-I workers.

We compared wage information supplied by both employers, and found that the variance in most cases isn't all that large. (In one category, average wages at the Times and P-I were just 2 cents per hour apart.)

Because the P-I doesn't have separate Circulation or Advertising departments, these comparisons are for news/editorial positions only.

Which paper pays more?


Reporter: P-I
Photographer: Times
Artist: P-I
Layout editor/page designer: P-I
Receptionist: Times
News researcher: Times
Editorial writer: P-I
Desk editor: P-I (But the P-I has both desk editors and copy editors; the Times has no copy editors. When the desk editor and copy editor positions are combined, average wages for these positions are higher at the Times.)

Some positions weren't compared because they didn't have a clear equivalent in the other newsroom.

Ratification meetings

Come discuss and vote on the proposed contract.

2 p.m. & 6 p.m.
Friday, July 21, 2006
First-floor conference room
P-I building

Friday, July 14, 2006

Tentative agreement!

The following is a list of items to which Guild representatives and P-I management have tentatively agreed. A ratification vote will be scheduled soon. Members will receive due notice and be able to review copies of the full contract prior to voting.

Seattle Post-Intelligencer/CWA-Newspaper Guild Local 37082
Publisher Proposal
July 13, 2006

(Red=deleted language; blue=inserted language.)

The Seattle Post-Intelligencer (“P-I” or “the Publisher”) proposes the following changes to the labor agreement by and between the Publisher and the CWA-Newspaper Guild Local 37082 (“Guild”), expiring on July 21, 2006, as a basis for a new agreement:

1. Tentative Agreement (TA 7/13/06) Under the Preamble, revise list of excluded job titles consistent with those described in Attachment A to this proposal.
2. TA 7/13/06 Under Article XIV – Job Classifications & Minimum Salaries, increase contract weekly minimum rates of pay by twenty dollars ($20.00) effective July 22, 2006, and another twenty-five dollars ($25.00) effective July 22, 2007. Pay for performance increases were effective May 1, 2006 and supersede weekly minimum rates of pay effective July 22, 2006.
3. TA 6/2/06 Revise the third sentence of Article XI-Leaves of Absence, paragraph (B) as follows: “Request for leave shall be submitted at least sixty (60) thirty (30) days in advance but may be accepted with less notice.”
4. TA 6/2/06 Revise the second sentence of Article XI-Leaves of Absence, paragraph (B)(4) as follows: “An employee shall be entitled to take an unpaid leave of absence for childbirth or adoption for a reasonable length of time and thereafter return to her/his job.”
5. Under Article XVI, paragraph (A)(4), increase split days off premium to forty dollars ($40.00).
6. TA 6/2/06 Delete Memorandum of Understanding on compensatory time off and create a NEW Article XVI(J): “It is understood at the employee’s request and with agreement by the Publisher, compensatory time at time and one-half may be taken during the work week in lieu of compensation for overtime in cash.”
7. TA 6/2/06 Under Article XIX, paragraph (O), add “domestic partner of either sex” and “any relative who regularly lived with the employee” to the definition of “immediate family.”
8. TA 7/10/06 Change Article VIII (C) as follows: “No deductions for sick leave shall be made from overtime or vacation Paid Time Off credited or to be credited to the employee.”
9. TA 7/10/06 Change Article XV (B) as follows: “It is agreed that the Publisher and the Guild have heretofore agreed on the job classifications of all present employees covered by the contract, both as to type of work in all jobs and years of experience in such jobs of said employees for the term of the contract period July 22, 2000 and July 21, 2006.
10. TA 7/10/06 Article XVIII (C), change the first sentence to “The Pacific Northwest Newspaper Guild, Communications Workers of America Local 37082, agrees that before it authorizes its members to refuse to cross a picket line to be established in the manner described above, it shall give the Publisher twenty-four (24) hours’ written notice, exclusive of Saturdays, Sundays and holidays.”
11. TA 7/10/06 Job Share MOU paragraph 9, change the first sentence to “This agreement shall take effect upon signing by the parties and remain in effect until July 21, 2006 2008 unless terminated by either party by one hundred twenty (120) days written notice.”
12. TA 7/10/06 Editorial Board MOU. Change the first sentence as follows: “This will confirm that Editorial Board employees David Horsey and Joe Copeland the yet to be named individual to be hired into the vacancy in existence as of the date of signing of this Agreement will be excluded from the bargaining unit as managerial employees.”
13. Memorandum of Understanding - Termination Pay and the Effects of the Cessation of P-I Operations.

If, and only if, the outcome of Case No. 03-2-23950-0 SEA (King County Superior Court) results in a decision by The Hearst Corporation to cease newspaper publishing operations, this memorandum of understanding will supersede and replace Article 6 – Dismissal Pay and will comprehensively address the negotiated effects of any cessation of P-I newspaper publishing operations. The Publisher and the Guild agree that Article 6 – Dismissal Pay, this MOU and any other current or potential subject(s) of effects bargaining resulting from the decision to cease P-I newspaper publishing operations following the outcome of Case No. 03-2-23950-0 will not be subject to further negotiation or renegotiation, unless the parties agree otherwise in writing. These terms constitute minimum terms; the Publisher reserves the right to exceed these terms individually or collectively in its discretion. This Agreement shall terminate on December 31, 2009.

(1) Termination Pay. Each regular full-time and part-time employee on the active payroll of the P-I on its last day of newspaper publishing operations who suffers an involuntary loss of employment of any length or duration resulting from the cessation of newspaper publishing operations shall receive termination pay as calculated under the schedule in Attachment B. Such payments will occur in lump sum form (less required withholdings) as soon as practical, or within sixty (60) calendar days, after the cessation of P-I newspaper publishing operations.

Upon termination, employees eligible for termination pay shall receive in writing a statement of how much pay they shall receive.

An employee will be ineligible for termination pay if, on or before the date of cessation of newspaper publishing operations, he or she (1) accepts an offer of comparable employment at another Hearst property, (2) is offered comparable employment by a Hearst property that does not increase the employee’s daily round-trip commute by more than fifty (50) highway miles, or (3) is offered comparable employment by a successor owner of the P-I. A position is not comparable if the rate of pay at the time of the offer is more than ten percent (10%) less than the employee’s regular weekly salary as defined in Attachment B, paragraph B.

Payments under Article XX – Alternate Benefits Severance Plan shall be in lieu of termination pay under this Agreement.

The Publisher believes the most effective employee retention efforts are those customized to the individual needs and concerns of the employee and employer, and it will continue to address individual retention issues on a case-by-case basis.

(2) Publisher-paid COBRA. The Publisher agrees to pay COBRA premiums on behalf of individual employees for a period of six (6) months following cessation of P-I newspaper publishing operations. The Publisher will pay premiums directly to the insurance carrier. Premiums will be paid at the level of coverage for which the employee was enrolled upon cessation of P-I operations (employees may have to switch plans to make it possible for them to receive access to COBRA coverage). For an employee to have premiums paid on her/his behalf, the employee must not be covered under any other group insurance program for those six (6) months. The period for which the Publisher pays COBRA premiums will be counted among the eighteen (18) months generally allowed under COBRA regulations.
(3) Outplacement assistance. The Publisher will provide onsite outplacement services through a third-party provider who will assist employees in matters including resume preparation, interview techniques and general job search recommendations.
(4) Notice of employment opportunities at other Hearst newspapers. Prior to closing, the Publisher will inform employees of job openings at other Hearst newspaper properties and will provide employees with contact information at those properties.
(5) Letters of Recommendation and References. The Publisher agrees to provide, upon request, letters of recommendation for employees to use in job searches, and to provide contact information for company managers for purposes of securing employment references.

14. Bargaining understanding regarding the administration of Paid Time Off (PTO). During the course of negotiations, the Guild advised the Publisher of employee concerns regarding the difficulties of scheduling PTO for some employees. The Publisher agrees to take steps with management to ensure employees will be able to take time off under the PTO policy. As part of this commitment, each month the Publisher will notify any employee who is within forty (40) hours of the PTO cap.
15. Under Article XXIII, Term, revise paragraph (A) to reflect a contract term of two (2) years running from July 22, 2006 to July 21, 2008.

The Publisher proposes the following items conditioned upon the Guild negotiating committee recommending this settlement offer:

a. For inclusion in the Memorandum of Understanding – Termination Pay and the Effects of the Cessation of P-I Operations:

It is understood and agreed that Article VI – Dismissal Pay will apply should employees suffer an involuntary loss of employment resulting from a decision by The Hearst Corporation to cease P-I newspaper publishing operations for reasons unrelated to the outcome of Case No. 03-2-23950-0-SEA (King County Superior Court).

b. Increase night-shift differential from $1.00 to $2.00.



Attachment A


Excluded Positions
Positions: Blue = new. Red = delete.

Preamble

Resident Controller
Executive Editor
Managing Editor
Deputy Managing Editors
Metro Editor
Editorial Page Editor
News Editors
Systems Editors
Sports Editors
General Accounting & Facilities Manager
Promotion Manager
Copy Desk Chiefs News
Copy Desk Chief Lifestyle
Copy Desk Chief Sports
Assigning Editors
Business Editor
Asst. Business Editor
News Editor – Sports
Focus Editor
Asst. Metro Editors
Asst. Managing Editors
Graphics & Design Editor
Photo Editor
Asst. Photo Editors
Arts & Entertainment Editor
Readers Representative
Senior Editor
Associate Editor
Head Librarian
Asst. Sports Editor
National/Foreign Editor
Art Director
Lifestyle Editors
Associate Publisher
Confidential employees


Article 19 (H) – Confidential Administrative Assistants to:

Publisher
Executive Editor
Managing Editor
Associate Editor
Business Manager
Resident Controller

Memorandum of Understanding – Excluded by name:

David Horsey
Joe Copeland (the “employee to be named later”)


Attachment B

Termination-pay schedule. With CBA Dismissal Pay (regular severance) for comparison.

Years of Service .............. Termination Pay ..............CBA Dismissal Pay
0 to 3 years ..............13 weeks ..............None
3 to 3.5 years ..............13 weeks ..............7 weeks
3.5 to 4 years ..............13 weeks ..............8 weeks
4 to 4.5 years ..............13 weeks ..............9 weeks
4.5 to 5 years ..............13 weeks ..............10 weeks
5 to 5.5 years ..............13 weeks ..............11 weeks
5.5 to 6 years ..............14 weeks ..............12 weeks
6 to 6.5 years ..............15 weeks ..............13 weeks
6.5 to 7 years ..............16 weeks ..............14 weeks
7 to 7.5 years ..............17 weeks ..............15 weeks
7.5 to 8 years ..............18 weeks ..............16 weeks
8 to 8.5 years ..............19 weeks ..............17 weeks
8.5 to 9 years ..............20 weeks ..............18 weeks
9 to 9.5 years ..............21 weeks ..............19 weeks
9.5 to 10 years ..............22 weeks ..............20 weeks
10 to 10.5 years ..............23 weeks ..............21 weeks
10.5 to 11 years ..............24 weeks ..............22 weeks
11 to 11.5 years ..............25 weeks ..............23 weeks
11.5 to 12 years ..............26 weeks ..............24 weeks
12 to 12.5 years ..............27 weeks ..............25 weeks
12.5 to 13 years ..............28 weeks ..............26 weeks
13 to 13.5 years ..............29 weeks ..............27 weeks
13.5 to 14 years ..............30 weeks ..............28 weeks
14 to 14.5 years ..............31 weeks ..............29 weeks
14.5 to 15 years ..............32 weeks ..............30 weeks
15 to 15.5 years ..............33 weeks ..............31 weeks
15.5 to 16 years ..............34 weeks ..............32 weeks
16 to 16.5 years ..............35 weeks ..............33 weeks
16.5 to 17 years ..............36 weeks ..............34 weeks
17 to 17.5 years ..............37 weeks ..............35 weeks
17.5 to 18 years ..............38 weeks ..............36 weeks
18 to 18.5 years ..............39 weeks ..............37 weeks
18.5 to 19 years ..............40 weeks ..............38 weeks
19 to 19.5 years ..............41 weeks ..............39 weeks
19.5 to 20 years ..............42 weeks ..............40 weeks
20 to 20.5 years ..............43 weeks ..............41 weeks
20.5 to 21 years ..............44 weeks ..............42 weeks
21 to 21.5 years ..............45 weeks ..............43 weeks
21.5 to 22 years ..............46 weeks ..............44 weeks
22 to 22.5 years ..............47 weeks ..............45 weeks
22.5 to 23 years ..............48 weeks ..............46 weeks
23 to 23.5 years ..............49 weeks ..............47 weeks
23.5 to 24 years ..............50 weeks ..............48 weeks
24 to 24.5 years ..............51 weeks ..............49 weeks
24.5 to 25 years ..............52 weeks ..............50 weeks
25 to 25.5 years ..............53 weeks ..............51 weeks
25.5 to 26 years ..............54 weeks ..............52 weeks
26 to 26.5 years .............. 55 weeks ..............53 weeks
26.5 to 27 years ..............56 weeks ..............54 weeks
27 to 27.5 years ..............57 weeks ..............55 weeks
27.5 to 28 years ..............58 weeks ..............56 weeks
28 to 28.5 years .............. 59 weeks ..............57 weeks
28.5 to 29 years ..............60 weeks ..............58 weeks
29 to 29.5 years ..............61 weeks ..............59 weeks
29.5 to 30 years ..............62 weeks ..............60 weeks
30 to 30.5 years ..............63 weeks ..............61 weeks
30.5 yrs. & over ..............64 weeks ..............62 weeks

(A) From the termination pay, the Publisher shall deduct any levy or tax to which the employee is subject under local, state or federal legislation.
(B) Termination pay shall be computed at the regular weekly salary (exclusive of overtime, bonuses, shift differential pay, and payments for special work) for the last full week of employment prior to discharge. The years of continuous and uninterrupted employment provided herein shall mean the total consecutive and uninterrupted years of service with any Hearst newspaper, provided dismissal pay has not been previously paid, and provided that breaks in service with the Seattle Post-Intelligencer and breaks in service of not more than six (6) months with any Hearst newspaper, when occasioned by a discharge for reasons for which the employee was not responsible, shall not be regarded as an interruption in service.

Monday, July 10, 2006

Attention!

We've heard from some of you, but now we need to hear from everyone.

COMP TIME! How much have you got? What kind of side agreements have you made with your editors? How do you account for this time?

Please let us know your frustrations and successes. Be detailed, please.

You can e-mail Candace Heckman about this confidentially at candaceheckman@gmail.com or come talk to her. Or, if for some reason you can't (or don't want to) talk to Candace, catch Kery Murakami at kerymurakami@aol.com

Back to the table

The PI’s guild bargaining committee and Hearst negotiators moved closer toward an agreement on a new contract on Monday.

Though significant details remain to be resolved, Hearst offered two additional weeks of severance pay to employees who’ve worked more than seven years at the paper, on top of its previous offer of increasing severance to newer employees.

At serious issue is the way in which employees are (or in many cases, are not) allowed to use their PTO. Both management and Guild agree that people need to be able to use this very important benefit. They will likely continue to discuss ways to assure employees get adequate rest and relaxation from what has become an increasingly stressful job.

In the spirit of providing more incentives for retaining employees, Hearst also offered paying for COBRA health care coverage for three months. Both the severance and COBRA coverage would only be good in the event of a P-I closure stemming from the JOA arbitration with the Times. Guild negotiators countered with six months of COBRA coverage.

Additionally, Hearst negotiators offered:

-- to take steps to ensure employees are allowed to take PTO and notify employees when they are within 40 hours of reaching their limit on accruing PTO. Guild negotiators countered with its original proposal to lift the cap on cashing out PTO as further incentive to allow people to take time off;

-- to increase the split-shift differential from $30 to $40;

-- to provide outplacement services – such as resume preparation;

-- to notify people of employment opportunities at other Hearst properties, and provide references,

Negotiators are scheduled to meet again at 11 am on Thursday in the 1st floor conference room at the P-I. Observers are welcome.

Monday, June 19, 2006

Sitting in: The rules

Negotiations at The Seattle Times and Seattle Post-Intelligencer are open to any Guild members who wish to attend. If you choose to sit in on a bargaining session, please observe the following protocol:

1. Unless you've been specifically invited as a "guest" negotiator, plan to attend sessions on your own time, such as breaks, lunch or dinner periods, or on your days off.

2. Try not to disrupt when you enter or leave. When you enter, explain that you are there to observe. Take a seat in the room away from the negotiating table.

3. Do not speak during negotiation sessions unless someone on the Guild bargaining team invites you to do so. You are free to stay in the room when the Guild takes a break and goes into caucus. That's a great time to ask questions of the bargaining team.

Wednesday, June 14, 2006

"We're going to move and meet you where we can"

P-I management, in a departure from its past stance, said Wednesday that it’s willing to talk about “effects” issues that would occur in the event of the P-I’s closing.

Management had previously declined to discuss such issues, including payment of COBRA benefits, so as not to increase worries about a possible shutdown. The Guild’s bargaining team argued that employees are already worried about that possibility, and assurances that their health benefits would continue through COBRA would give people peace of mind.

Management negotiator Matt Lynch said that the paper would “see what we can do about” several issues raised by the Guild including:

  • COBRA payments
  • Assurances that P-I members would be employed if Hearst closes the P-I and buys The Seattle Times.
  • Improved severance packages

Management said it would make a counterproposal at the next bargaining session on Monday, July 10, from 1 p.m. to 4 p.m. at a location to be decided. Guild members are encouraged to attend. Another session is scheduled July 13, from 1 p.m. to 5 p.m. in the first-floor conference room.

“We’re going to move and meet you where we can,” Lynch said.

Guild negotiators asked about P-I publisher Roger Oglesby’s provocative comment at a staff meeting on Tuesday. He seemed to suggest that dismissal pay would not be paid in the event of a plant closure.

Guild Administrative Officer Liz Brown called the statement “provocative” and ill-advised. Lynch said the matter was “moot because we’re discussing dismissal pay in the event of a plant closure.” He never explicitly said dismissal pay would be honored.

After a particularly disappointing session last week in which management offered no more money than in its initial proposal, the Guild’s bargaining team – Candace Heckman, Athima Chansanchai, Art Thiel and Kery Murakami – made its own counteroffer. Among the key elements:

  • Withdrew its proposal for a $5,000 signing bonus;
  • Proposed a retention bonus of eight weeks of pay for all bargaining-unit members who are still employed at the time of the arbitrator’s decision next year if the arbitration decision or any decision by any party that would lead to the closure of the P-I.

(Management had offered six weeks.)

The retention bonus would be taken out of the regular severance due to employees; the balance would be paid if people remained at the paper until closure.

Ordinarily, you get no severance if you leave voluntarily. Under this proposal, people who stay until a negative arbitrator’s decision would get the bonus even if they leave voluntarily.

Lynch wondered if even the eight weeks of pay would be enough of an incentive for people to stay, and said management may instead come back with a different proposal to address retention;

  • Proposed increasing severance pay in the event of a closure to three weeks for every year of service, instead of two weeks for every year of service.
  • Lynch said management will consider proposing “an enhanced form of dismissal pay.”
  • Proposed a payout of the cash equivalent of COBRA costs for one year in the event of closure. Lynch said employers typically do not give the cash equivalent of COBRA costs, but might be willing to make COBRA payments for employees;
  • Proposed guaranteed jobs for P-I employees at the Times, should Hearst buy the Times and close the P-I. Lynch said management would be reluctant to make “guarantees” but said, “we’ll see what’s possible.”

P-I management said it’s also willing to deal with the problem some people are having with PTO. Some employees have been denied permission to take PTO, even though they have maxed out on accumulating more time.

“You have a sympathetic ear in that area,” Lynch said.

Additionally, Lynch said management would return with a response to the Guild’s proposal for help finding jobs, like resume writing; the use of P-I facilities for job searches, and letters of recommendations and references in the event the paper closes.

“We’re still apart on some issues, but there’s hope,” Lynch said.

Monday, June 12, 2006

P-I's money proposal

The company is offering employees the ability to cash out 25 percent of their severance and ditch early if the arbitrator comes back and closes the paper. In order to get one's full severance package, the employee would have to stay until the very end.

Here are some real examples of what some people would get without saying who these people are:

  • 30+ year vet --$15,000 cash out --$91,544 remainder
  • 20+ year vet --$15,000 cash out --$55,188 remainder
  • 15+ year vet --$11,417 cash out --$34,252 remainder
  • 10+ year vet --$6,585 cash out --$19,754 remainder
  • 5+ year vet --$4,391 cash out --$13,171 remainder
  • newbie --$1,870 cash out --$5,610 remainder

The fact that the company even proposed giving some money should probably be seen as a good sign. However, the complexity of its plan obviously leads me to question it. Basically, management's idea was to give something to new people (we're hiring a lot lately), but also allow for mid-level staffers to get out of Dodge early should the paper have to close.

The main question: Will it be enough to stop the brain drain? Management says, "Yes." Guild says "No." Only time and the needs of competing newsrooms will give the real answer.